This is to Rushlong in rebuttal to your last post. I am not doubting the fact that John knows the Co, or has ever lied about eating meals or meeting Michael Lynch. I am sure he knows the ppl at HQ, and he knows Corr. What I am arguing here (with facts)is that he is using his status to manipulate whether intentionally or unintentionally. Saying shitt like yeah buy these cheapie shares at 0.006, and saying ohh yeah PR's are expected about PO's soon, very soon. Within 10 business days, this baby is going way up. You telling me that is not manipulative?
There is no point of trying to argue with John Hollen Supporters. You are all 1 sided and will always be too stubborn to listen to reasons from a different point of view. No matter what you guys will backup John to the end. No matter what proof I show you, or what John says. You guys will back him forever.
Although my posts seem negative, I have shown you posts from himself that back up my claim. I am not pure discrediting this man, I am using his own posts against him as proof. That has to account for something. How am I pure bashing him, when I have good points and proof?
Some neutral investors see my point, especially since I have a point and have evidence to back it up. C Lawrence Perkins made a good post, he sees a different point of view, and has seen John hype up stocks over the years. Thank you Perkins for seeing the light like I have. He is an expert pumper.
And yes This is my last post, I do not care what John backers have to say. Bash me back I don't care. At least I am showing neutral parties a point of view. I personally think ThinkingBig has his own Agenda and bans people when their point of view has a conflict of interest with his own. this is probably why Donpat created a new Rushnet board. Some people see the 1-sided shizzle by Thinkingbig and friends. They simply ban you, and force posts 1 way as they see fit. |
