SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (7335)6/13/2006 12:27:50 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) of 9838
 
Move the UN to Haiti, and see how many delegates go there or go home.....

Annan hits at US use of ‘the power of the purse’ at UN
Financial Times ^ | June 12 2006 | Mark Turner

The US use of “the power of the purse” to force through reforms at the United Nations is lessening the chance of those reforms succeeding, secretary-general Kofi Annan warns in Monday’s Financial Times.

At the same time, however, he calls on all countries, including the developing world, to “turn down their rhetoric” and take a constructive attitude towards this month’s UN budget negotiations, which threaten to pit rich against poor in a battle with potentially damaging consequences.

“The UN faces a moment of truth,” writes Mr Annan. He notes that the main contributors of UN funds, led by the US, linked the disbursement of cash after June 30 to significant progress on UN reform.

“We are now perilously near the deadline, and it is far from clear that enough reform to satisfy them has been achieved,” says the UN chief. “Neither side has found a way of engaging with the other to agree on further reforms.”

His comments follow last week’s high-profile dispute between John Bolton, the US ambassador, and Mark Malloch Brown, the UN deputy secretary-general, after the British official called for better US engagement with the world body.

Mr Bolton demanded a retraction, and on Friday said: “You have to ask what possible benefit the secretary-general and the deputy SG thought they were going to get from attacking the most important member of their organisation.

“The way this works in New York is that member governments give directions to the secretariat, not the other way round. He’s not a feudal lord and we’re not serfs.”

But Mr Annan writes on Monday that Mr Malloch Brown’s appeal was “absolutely right”. At the same time, he added that “the same message needs to be heard in many other countries besides the US”.

The developing world’s quarrel, he wrote, was “much less with the detail of proposed reforms, than with what they see as the overwhelming influence of a few rich countries”.

Dumisani Kumalo, the South African ambassador who leads the G77 group of developing countries, last week described the budget cap as a “poison” that needed to be removed. He said Mr Malloch Brown’s comments were “indicative of the feelings throughout the system”.

But the US State Department stood by Mr Bolton, and hinted that funding was at stake.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext