SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (20888)6/14/2006 10:21:58 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 541180
 
I noted in my reply that the specific link made two arguments: (1) the ice continues to melt at the edges, no one disagrees with that; (2) the effects of increased precipitation in the interior are not clear--whether it's part of a pattern, random or what not. Or whether it matters.

I won't try to shoot down any assertion that increased precipitation, and ice growth in the interior might be just random or temporary, but it is happening, that fact is recognized, and there isn't a strong clear consensus on the overall level of change in the ice. It might just be a matter of short term fluctuations obscuring the trend, or maybe we don't have enough data yet, but even so there isn't a solid consensus at least not yet.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext