SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77121)6/14/2006 7:25:11 PM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
>>Those who had been watching the rise of world wide Wahhabi/Takfiri inspired jihadism with alarm expected something like a 9/11.<<

Nadine -

Oh, please. You're seriously trying to tell me that "the Dems" were all living in a dream world while Bush and his people were well aware of the danger?

Is that why Bush and his top people did not have even one single meeting on the subject of terrorism prior to 9/11? Is that why he mentioned terrorism only once in his State of the Union address in 2001? Is that why he mentioned it only twice during the entire campaign? Because if he expected something like 9/11 to happen, then did nothing about it, he is worse than even I believe him to be.

>>They spoke as they believed, Allen.<<

Why, then, were they so careful as to not actually ever say that there was a connection between Saddam and 9/11? No, they only made sure they were saying 9/11 and Saddam Hussein in the same paragraphs all the time.

Why, then, did the Bi-partisan 9/11 say they had found "no evidence of a working relationship between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda"? Why have Rumsfeld, Cheney, Rice, and Bush himself denied that they ever said there was any kind of connection? Because they have denied it, you know.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext