SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (21315)6/17/2006 8:58:30 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) of 541701
 
If you look at is straight on and go no further. But what are the implications of that? If you take away the penalty for not knocking, is the net effect of that not identical to that of removing the requirement to knock?

That's Breyer's point in the articles I've read and my point with the sweeping possibilities of the loss of the exclusionary rule. But the Scalias are taking a back road to the elimination, let's say of Miranda. Don't address Miranda on its face; just throw away the penalty if police don't Mirandize.

I suspect we'll get a lot more of this stuff about modern police are no longer the out of control folk from the past.

And talk of civil court remedies should procedure be violated.

Not a happy moment.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News