Two of your last three sentences are fighting each other - will the winner take on the third? ... how can you believe something without evidence, isn't the need to do so what turned you off of every religion you ever heard of
The concept of 'god' could be widened enough that there's no way you can reasonably deny the possibility ... DAK has put this well in recent posts i see ... how about for a definition, 'Any metaphysical, überphysical, and/or Ur-physical being, force, intelligence, current, substance, impulse, particle, power or other entity or entities having any knowledge of and/or connection with and/or influence in the way stuff works'
Everything we learn through science just leads to more questions, we never know it all ... that's not a complaint, just an observation of that's the way it is, our understanding is limited, we have much to be modest about, the basic quandaries for which man has invented religions since the beginning of time are still open - 1. how did we get here, 2. why, 3. where are we going, and 4. what the hell is wrong with rdv.v that they don't put their full share structure on the frickin website |
