SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Boxing: The Sweet Science
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bwe who wrote (10297)6/19/2006 9:24:53 AM
From: Sedohr Nod  Read Replies (1) of 10489
 
Bruce, I don't have an argument with the scoring. Call it 7-5 for either side and no big fuss from me. Most rounds had an ebb and flow that made them pick-ems. But...IMHO Winky should have tried to make Taylor miss more in the earlier rounds...befuddled maybe but not frustrated, Taylor landed the more significant blows. Most of us would probably prefer to take three of Winky's punches instead of two from Taylor.

I think Winky was "spoiled" in earlier bouts with fighters that would have been dominated physically by Taylor.

There will most likely be continued improvement in Taylor but no drastic change in his approach, assuming a rematch. He is a bull of fighter at middleweight. He impresses me as a fighter that will not be "capable" of varied fight strategies until lack of success makes it necessary.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News