SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mph who wrote (21721)6/22/2006 11:30:11 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 543726
 
The resultant babies had no say in the process. It's THEIR interests that require joint responsibility.

I would say that the interest of the baby, a third party, is another competing interest. It's in the best interest of the mother not to have the baby in the first place, which may mean having an abortion.

If you want the cycle to end, you have to ascribe joint responsibility.

You're certainly entitled to your opinion.

You must represent the dead-beat dads.

*Sigh.* Sure, that's what this is about, figuring out ways for men not to pay child support. Not having babies would certainly be a way.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News