SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (21748)6/22/2006 4:55:25 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 543686
 
it's more what is it possible to do and would doing it advance the cause a bit without hurting other things.

You and I are so different. I'm reminded me of a transaction I had with SI Bob about they "incremental" way he made changes to SI and the consequences of that. (Actually, "incremental" isn't the right word for the notion I'm fostering. "Incremental" implies steps in a larger plan. What I mean is really more "nibbles" than "increments.") He replied that he wouldn't do the work he does if he had to work in a software shop that demanded planning, modeling, staging, testing, etc., all that stuff that underpins effectiveness and professionalism. He sees that mode as not fun.

Cost effectiveness would apply in a fairly controllable situation: a bureaucracy strikes me as the best example.

That wasn't the right term, either. "Efficiency" is more the idea. I can't abide "Chinese fire drills." I value the disorder of markets because markets are inherently rational. But in public policy we lack that rational touch stone so disorder is very inefficient.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext