SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (20856)6/23/2006 9:59:29 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 35834
 
Apparently you have reading comprehension problems. Or is it a zealous liberal ideology disorder? Had you bothered to follow this story objectively you wouldn't have drawn the faulty conclusions you now hold.

The munitions found were in various states - they were NOT all completely degraded. Many of the munitions remained highly dangerous. These WMD's are being sought by terrorists. I seriously doubt they are interested in useless munitions. The declassified information made it clear that there are still more WMD's still in Iraq that have yet to be located. Santorum & Hoekstra both made it clear that there is much more to this story that remains classified. None of it is good for Saddam or the lies told by the DNC, MSM & many of your liberal peers.

Even if every single chemical munition was dated prior to the first Gulf War, they still were still 100% illegal. Saddam was required to declare every one of them to UN Inspectors. He didn't.

Saddam was also required to provide UN Inspectors positive verification of the destruction of ALL WMD's in Iraq. He didn't.

In any event, you might want to talk to your leading DNC politicos, the MSM & many of your leftist peers who have repeatedly lied about Iraq & the lack of any WMD's. These 500+ munitions in & of themselves represent a serious "stockpile" of WMD's that were in Saddam's possession illegally.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext