SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (171034)6/25/2006 1:07:26 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) of 793883
 
Yes, indeed. The Senators should look deeper. How did the NYT receive the info they used, and via what source? How do we, the American citizens the pols and media always are supposedly looking out for, judge that the NYT, LA Times, and WSJ are indeed correct in their info.....Or did they just make it up? Where is the oversight for the media?

Yes, both the Senate and the House should look MUCH deeper into this story. Are they afraid to?

Did the leak come from either the Senate or the House, or was it from SWIFT execs? Or was it from the "outside auditing firm..." ???

Congress, which has given the administration many new powers to conduct terrorism investigations, needs to judge whether this was what it had in mind. The original Patriot Act made major changes in money-laundering laws that provided for the use of administrative subpoenas. But the Judiciary chairman, Arlen Specter, was quoted yesterday as questioning whether their use in the Swift investigation has been too broad. The committee has already scheduled an oversight hearing this month, at which Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is slated to appear. The senators should take the opportunity to look deeper.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext