SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (171427)6/27/2006 4:39:10 PM
From: Murrey Walker  Read Replies (2) of 793917
 
Perhaps you've misread me a little.

I'm not on record as touting those 500 devices as a smoking gun for WMDs.

I'm am saying that these devices in and of themselves, when bundled with other explosives, are each a WMD. How large is arguable. The fact is real. And the intent to use them, by our enemies when found, is also very real

And no, in the scheme of things I believe we have yet to make a case for WMDs.

I find it interesting that countries (India and Pakistan) close to Iraq now have WMDs and to date are allies of ours. Doesn't it make sense that we put efforts forth to keep the damn things out of the hands of countries we know to be enemies? Isn't that part of what this whole thing is about?

To make fun of, and to poo poo events like this and what took place in Miami as innocuous, seems a little disingenuous to me. Do you find the NY Times to be a responsible citizen, too?

In the meantime, it remains to be seen as to whether I eat crow or not.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News