So in otherwords, Lance, when I predicted some 24 hours ago, that you wouldn't actually address company performance and your writing and thereof, then I called it spot on? Would you require a reference link for definition of outstanding shares?
Your first objection was about an alias. That issue was solved. Your second objection is that you were "insulted" by these words: >>"...but since you're adamant about not discussing those issues with an alias, then let's get with it; your discussion about it right here."<< However, that statement is not an insult. It is a statement of fact that you won't discuss company performance issues. I mean really, you've proven that much here, yourself in two posts, either to an "alias" (your first objection) or otherwise.
If you consider statements of fact to be insults, permit me to suggest that you throw away your modem, and not walk out of the house unless accompanied by a responsible guardian who can counsel you regarding such insulting atrocities. Perhaps borrowing a child of five from the neighbor should suffice. Did you get beat up a lot whilst in school (not counting this summer session, which is still young of course)?
Just answer Kirk's question ... (and how do you know that's an alias, anyway? He might really be a person named James Kirk, who served in the military). |
