SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (743957)6/28/2006 10:36:51 AM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) of 769669
 
"Or try to REDEFINE what ONE TRILLION means!"

Don't be dishonest Buddy. I did not redefine it. I suggested the cost (which is not even at or that close to one trillion btw) be compared to something useful. Not a RIDICULOUS and MEANINGLESS one that is designed to appeal to the average Joe's emotions.

Seems like a sensable guy like you would want a pertinent comparison. Something designed to help people UNDERSTAND the cost in comparison to our WEALTH and the cost of DIUBG NOTHING. But the left appeals to emotion, and to the average Joe and Jane some silly analogy to speniding a million a day (which they are not doing) for a million days (which will not happen) works to get them to change their opinion (or buy into the editorial position of the writer). The left should try to be serious and inform folks in real terms to help them decide what is right and wrong. But as we both know, the left TELLS people how they should think about something.

"basic math is not affected by your emotions"

The article is not about basic math. It is about the war wrecking America. As I infer above, you know that is not my point (that the math is incorrect). But you "debate" it as though it is. It is your style. And it is a bit dishonest imo.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext