SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gib Bogle who wrote (14875)6/30/2006 4:51:33 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) of 78419
 
Maybe, baybe, bud... bud.. simple systems that behave deterministically in a "conjugate fashion" uniquely from a starting point, are not the same as a large system with many varying inputs, even if fluid flow can be shown to have oscillators in local areas that create non predictive effects.

In other words it is purely assumptive that the system of many complex and various inputs behaves chaotically because it is complex. It may be chaotic, but this has not been proved, but conjectured. Proving it, as I pointed out wout be worth multiple Nobels.

Leaving out variables in any system, or hidden variables could account for variances in behaviour that appear impredictable.

In other words we know the problem is hard and that extended time periods beyond say two weeks bring into account variants that recede to immeasurable areas (+8,000 miles) or even back to the target point.

I think Laplace is still alive.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News