SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (24235)6/30/2006 6:53:46 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (2) of 28931
 
you had proof for.
I said I , or rather others smarter than I, have proof that the universe had a start.

You keep trying to say it is equivilent to other things which it is not. To begin with, you seem to be implying that proof is something beyond what it is. I'll try to use the venacular again (although that always gets me misunderstood).

I might say that we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the universe had a beginning. That doesn't mean that it's inconcievable that there is another explanation, only that we are very very very certain. That is what is meant by proof.

The actual information that defined the state of the universe at the instant of the big bang is gone (at least it's gone from our universe). The universe can't be big enough to hold itself and a copy of it's prior information. You might say that what we have left is copies of copies of that information passed down for tens of billions of years.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News