SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (24244)6/30/2006 7:16:16 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 28931
 
"It's backed up by evidence and peer review."

It, being the chain of events following a big bang, is backed by evidence and peer review is a logical conclusion.

It, being proof that time began at this point, is not backed by this logic.

It doesn't demonstrate what you said it would, proof of a beginning. In fact, using your logic, the evidence denies a beginning. It only provides evidence of one plausible explanation for a chain of events, that start at a gumball, and stops there with no logical reason for the stoppage.

I can prove all kinds of starting points for the current situation, they all have precedents. My alarm bell rang this morning to start a chain that leads to now. What about the gumball? Did a bell ring for it? Why do you keep claiming the big bang accounts for that when it absolutely does not. If you think it does, then tell me the secret. Otherwise I can only conclude that it is illogical beliefs that are contradicted by your logic of cause and effect.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News