Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Carragher who wrote (171901)	7/1/2006 12:47:18 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 793789

because the democrats would rather have the country run big debts than correct soc sec under republican adm I don't think that's fair. There is a legitimate difference of opinion over social security. The Dems don't want to move towards privatization. I don't agree with them but I have to recognize that as a legitimamte POV. Had Bush moved to reform social security some other way, you don't know that they would have blocked it. Further, privatization wasn't very popular with more than just Dems. Social security is a very popular program across the board and doing anything that appears to weaken it will get honest resistance. Privatization makes it less reliable. Lots of people want to keep the guarantee.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next