Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 175.25

+0.6%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: engineer who wrote (53048)	7/2/2006 8:42:00 AM
From: alanrs	Read Replies (3) of 197007

Thank you for that post. On the Qualcom board on I-Hub there is a similar parallel universe conversation going on between someone posting as Eric (I presume EricL from the style) and a Bored Observer. This is fine by me, as it is a free country, but I've always wondered what the object of all that is. Obviously a great deal of time, effort and SKILL is going into these posts, and I just don't see the payoff to the poster. Is this just to convince a bunch of small investors to sell their few hundred shares? To drive the price down so that I don't know what happens? To discourage QCOM to the point that they all take arsenic and go away? To put a certain amount of disingenuous information out in the public domain in case some judge stumbles across it and is influenced? I can't come up with a plausible scenario, and it's bugging me. Does anyone out there have a good theory? ARS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next