Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24321)	7/3/2006 2:50:53 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 28931

It is a serious conceptual contradiction to either address things 'outside' the universe or to dismiss things outside the universe. Where is this 'outside'? "That is outside the universe and therefore not relevant... If something outside the universe were in a cause-effect relationship with the stuff inside the universe it would show up as gross distortions of the cause-effect relationships within the universe." If you are going to describe the universe as a closed system, linear arguments will fail. "... every step from singularity to gumball, although that would be nice. In time that may be available. The call of the faithful, "The proof shall be forth coming in time." If you are now suggesting that there could be steps to the gumball, your earlier claim of proof that the gumball was the beginning has poofed. If you are gravitating toward the concept of singularity, there may be still be some wiggle room. I doubt you realize the implications but I could be wrong about that.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next