Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24331)	7/3/2006 6:32:15 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"There is still another millionth of a second that is uncertain." You said you have proof of a beginning. You have not proven it, nor are you likely to. Why not just come clean? I have asked you repeatedly to qualify the term 'before' and 'beyond'. Anything that could be before or beyond the edge of detectability is still by definition 'The Universe'. Likewise, if there is anything before or beyond the ability to detect things inside the smallest extent of the universe, which by human detection or beyond the limits of human detection could be detectable it qualifies by definition as 'The Universe'. By your description, time extends to the past infinitely because a time before time is still time since 'before' is a time designation. This applies to the future as well because 'after' is a time designation. Your simplistic declarations that your argument indicates edges and beginnings are not upheld by the logic of your argument If you define a limit to human detectability, you also by default make inference to things beyond human detectability. You used the term 'singularity'. Undetectable uniformity is not nonexistence.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next