Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKM)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: StockDung who wrote (2284)	7/6/2006 7:14:39 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) of 2595

I tried to warn some posters but the feeling among many was that if Cuban were involved, there would be massive gains, given his supposed reputation. What I'm saying is that someone who is a "Crusader," should make sure that his dealings are above rapproach. Clearly, some of the news releases created expectations in the public that were not reflected in reality. The deal was not structured to enhance shareholder values. Were fiduciary duties to minority interests protected? This is a key question that should be answered. Cuban may be protected by filings and by disclaimers, but is that any way for a "Crusader" to act? Does his announced intention of front running his exposure of scams make him more of a "Crusader?" Why is the "Crusader" community silent on these issues? What would have been the reaction from the "Crusader" community if this deal were done by someone else? It should not be "my scam is ok, yours is not." At least, that's my opinion, no claim being made that any actual scamming is being done by Cuban or others. Perception is the key in markets and fiduciary concepts are often vague and equity based.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next