Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.23

-0.6%

Dec 22 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Clarksterh who wrote (53297)	7/6/2006 9:00:21 PM
From: Brihack	Read Replies (2) of 197015

Clark, "Bingo" wasn't my first reaction to your confirmation...it was "Damn" but at least the issue is resolved in my mind. Do you or anyone else with insight into the wireless industry know of other companies besides Qualomm who have set themselves up as aggregators of IPR pass-thru rights for their customers/licensees? I wonder whether, if Qualcomm lowered its royalty rate by 1%, another IPR claimant(s) in WCDMA would simply raise their own asking price to make up the difference? It sure strikes me as funny how Qualcomm's royalty rate is the only rate being charged that ever gets much debate...probably because its the biggest target as you pointed out earlier. Thanks, Bri

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next