Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (24399)	7/7/2006 12:37:51 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) of 28931

<One of the things he realized was that if you could go faster than that beam, then you could get to the destination first and learn what could be "seen" before anything actually had a chance to see it. This violated cause & effect because you could wind up reacting to something based on what "you see" faster than someone else would see the event you were reacting to.> He may have realized that... but so what? This doesn't prove anything, expecially since "seeing" is simply sensory ability of ours that evolved from the condition we have of light bouncing off of food on this planet. Some people react faster to light than others anyway... there must be another point. BTW... who cares about 'violating cause and effect'?? What scientific "theory" is that? Isn't that more in the philosophical realm? If it's impossible to move faster than the speed of light (something with mass right?), then there must be physical reasons... not just because you like cause and effect... cause and effect should be a byproduct, no? dAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next