Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fairways9 who wrote (1216)	9/23/1997 7:47:00 PM
From: john harris	of 3347

May I exercise my right to re-open the file I just closed? <<I still disagree that these guy reputations are not affected. I am willing to agree to disagree on this one and go on.>> Great post! Although under my picture in my high school yearbook (yes, the yellowed pages) it says "voted most likely to communicate", I noticed by your previous post that I have not spelled my position out succinctly. I believe that you will still disagree. Yet I would like my position clarified for the record. I believe that the reputation of a "passive" director (my terminology) remains unaffected by a corporate calamity. In the interest of clarity let me define "passive" as non-"active". An "active" director would be an employee-director or a director with a high profile investment in the company. Such individuals presumably are expected to be "hands-on" to the regular operations of a company. All others, in my opinion, are immune from notoriety upon disaster. Ergo, Stud, Mud, and Dud are culpable for any failure in both KLSE and FONX. I hope this clarifies my position. Discussion from my side ended. (Besides I'll be in Europe for the next few days.) :-)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next