SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mick Mørmøny who wrote (56950)7/9/2006 5:03:18 PM
From: Mick MørmønyRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
The Growing Problem of Fraud

By BOB TEDESCHI
Published: July 9, 2006

WITH interest rates at historic lows in recent years, consumers have raced to get mortgages. So have criminals.

Industry executives and law-enforcement officials say mortgage fraud continues to climb, with lenders incurring more than $1 billion in fraud losses in the last fiscal year, twice the amount of the previous year. And while no organization has yet tracked how much consumers have lost to fraud, anecdotal evidence suggests that those levels, too, are rising sharply.

"The problem is definitely growing," said Tim Doyle, the senior director of government affairs at the Mortgage Bankers Association in Washington. "The F.B.I. has prioritized this, state attorneys general are looking at this, and more state laws are being passed about it."

About 80 percent of mortgage fraud involves professional thieves who are bilking lenders, the F.B.I. estimates, while in the remaining cases consumers are involved in one way or another.

This second category is known in law enforcement as "fraud for property." Typically, mortgage applicants falsify financial documents so they can qualify for an out-of-reach mortgage, or their lender or broker falsifies the documents on their behalf, looking for profit or a quick commission. Consumers frequently default on such loans, losing their homes and ruining their credit.

Fraud against a lender is known as "fraud for profit." In such cases a criminal group works with an unscrupulous appraiser, typically finding a house that has sat on the market for a while at a certain price. They offer the homeowner that price, with a stipulation: the homeowner must allow the criminals' appraiser to value the home at, say, 30 percent higher.

A criminal in the ring takes out a loan for the higher amount using stolen financial and personal information. When the criminals get the money, they pay the former homeowner the original asking price, then split the remainder among themselves.

Harry Dinham, the president of National Association of Mortgage Brokers in McLean, Va., said that although the authorities are trying to combat the problem, it is so widespread they have not yet caught up. "Criminals have figured out this is a way to make extra money and not get caught on a regular basis," he said.

Ira Rheingold, the executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates, a nonprofit legal group in Washington, said prospective homeowners should be wary of unwittingly involving themselves in fraud.

According to Mr. Rheingold, most consumers who engage in mortgage fraud are subprime borrowers. A predatory lender will push such cash-poor borrowers into loans they cannot afford by overstating their income and assets on the loan application. "Some applications created by brokers are the greatest pieces of fiction I ever read," he said.

These borrowers are either not sophisticated enough to catch falsifications on the loan's closing documents or simply don't want to lose the chance to live in a particular house.

To avoid such situations, Mr. Rheingold said, borrowers should know their credit scores and shop around to get a sense of what loan terms they can reasonably expect. Applicants should also demand closing documents early in the process, so they can catch inaccuracies or falsifications before they pack up for the move.

And although consumers cannot do much to thwart "fraud for profit," they should be aware that such crimes ultimately cost them money, Mr. Dinham said. "Companies aren't going to continue to lose money on this without charging more," he said. "Anytime you have a problem this broad, consumers end up paying a premium at some point."


nytimes.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext