SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Stem Cell Research

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: SnowShredder7/10/2006 3:46:15 PM
   of 495
 
A macroporous hydrogel for the coculture of neural progenitor and endothelial cells to form functional vascular networks in vivo

fwiw...

pnas.org

Best of Luck,

SS

Published online before print February 10, 2006, 10.1073/pnas.0506020102
PNAS | February 21, 2006 | vol. 103 | no. 8 | 2512-2517

This Article

Figures Only
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Supporting Information
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Citation Map

Services

Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Add to My File Cabinet
Download to citation manager
Request Copyright Permission

Google Scholar

Articles by Ford, M. C.
Articles by Lavik, E. B.

PubMed

PubMed Citation
Articles by Ford, M. C.
Articles by Lavik, E. B.
Pubmed/NCBI databasesMedline Plus Health Information
Stem Cells and Stem Cell Transplantation


Related Collections

Tissue Engineering Special Feature

Tissue Engineering Special Feature
MEDICAL SCIENCES
A macroporous hydrogel for the coculture of neural progenitor and endothelial cells to form functional vascular networks in vivo
Millicent C. Ford*, James P. Bertram*, Sara Royce Hynes*, Michael Michaud, Qi Li, Michael Young, Steven S. Segal*,,¶, Joseph A. Madri, and Erin B. Lavik*,||

Departments of *Biomedical Engineering, Pathology, and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Boston, MA 02114; and ¶The John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519

Edited by Robert Langer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved October 20, 2005 (received for review July 15, 2005)

A microvascular network is critical for the survival and function of most tissues. We have investigated the potential of neural progenitor cells to augment the formation and stabilization of microvascular networks in a previously uncharacterized three-dimensional macroporous hydrogel and the ability of this engineered system to develop a functional microcirculation in vivo. The hydrogel is synthesized by cross-linking polyethylene glycol with polylysine around a salt-leached polylactic-co-glycolic acid scaffold that is degraded in a sodium hydroxide solution. An open macroporous network is formed that supports the efficient formation of tubular structures by brain endothelial cells. After subcutaneous implantation of hydrogel cocultures in mice, blood flow in new microvessels was apparent at 2 weeks with perfused networks established on the surface of implants at 6 weeks. Compared to endothelial cells cultured alone, cocultures of endothelial cells and neural progenitor cells had a significantly greater density of tubular structures positive for platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 at the 6-week time point. In implant cross sections, the presence of red blood cells in vessel lumens confirmed a functional microcirculation. These findings indicate that neural progenitor cells promote the formation of endothelial cell tubes in coculture and the development of a functional microcirculation in vivo. We demonstrate a previously undescribed strategy for creating stable microvascular networks to support engineered tissues of desired parenchymal cell origin.

microvasculature | neural stem cells | polymer | scaffold

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author contributions: M.C.F., J.A.M., and E.B.L. designed research; M.C.F., J.P.B., S.R.H., M.M., Q.L., and S.S.S. performed research; M.Y. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.C.F., J.P.B., and E.L. analyzed data; and M.C.F., J.P.B., S.R.H., S.S.S., J.A.M., and E.B.L. wrote the paper.
Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

||To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: erin.lavik@yale.edu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext