SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191391)7/11/2006 12:46:36 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
And if these soldiers are found guilty of the crime they are accused of, I hope they get the chair (or the firing squad). The crime is just that pre-meditated (according to current allegations) and brutal.. I don't want them in the army, nor walking the face of these planet.

Then you should work on fixing the system, not just the broken cog. I don't understand people who advocate recruiting 18 year olds, training them to kill, giving them weapons, then saying, gee, that was a naughty boy, we should give him the chair.

I know a number of said problem teenagers who joined the army, and I would sure as hell would not want them living next to me with a gun, let alone if I were considered the "enemy", and they had the backing of Uncle Sam behind them. Yet the recruiters happily sign them up. There needs to be much better screening IMO. But then we would need a draft, so not likely to happen.

I still think video documentation on all helmets should be mandatory. Any soldier returning from patrol who's video looks wacky for some reason gets removed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext