Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (191704)	7/14/2006 10:33:22 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

No, it was an extremely low priority from a war on terror standpoint. What's your evidence to support such a statement? You've never been there.. You've never poured through thousands of Iraqi Intelligence documents, many of which detail their involvement with terrorist groups of all kinds, INCLUDING AL QAI'DA.. Just because Saddam was pretty savvy about making sure his fingerprints could not be directly linked to actual terrorist acts, there is MORE THAN SUFFICIENT evidence that his regime was involved in training and orchestrating terrorist acts. I personally saw accounting slips for the purchase of car bombs to be used against Saudi Arabia and a number of documents detailing involvment with Senior Al Qai'da leadership like Zawahiri. No.. you were not there. You did not see. You can not comprehend. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next