Iomega - A Civil Discussion Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega - A Civil Discussion

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: FuzzFace who wrote (1896)	9/23/1997 11:32:00 PM
From: Gottfried	of 1908

Edwin, I found only this (the HP stuff must be archived) on Nu-kote. I'm not interested in pursuing it further, since I'm not a lawyer. biz.yahoo.com Excerpt... Nu-kote also said today that Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles invalidated a key design patent on refill cartridges for Seiko-Epson inkjet printers. In his ruling against Seiko-Epson, the Judge found the Seiko-Epson design patent to be unenforceable. This was the fifth patent Seiko-Epson has lost this year in the patent infringement suit it brought against inkjet cartridge competitor, Nu-kote. What's the relevance? Nu-kote seems to think they have a right to sell refill ink cartridges for Seiko-Epson printers. This does not necessarily mean the situation between Iomega and Nomai is the same. But it would give me something to worry about, if others had not assured me this kind of thing cannot happen. GM

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next