ASND - Discussion, but no quotes Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ASND - Discussion, but no quotes

ASND 201.04

-0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (134)	9/24/1997 12:05:00 AM
From: Richard Russell	of 186

Glenn, This is great work. I have always wanted to get to these morons and hold their feet to the fire and make them accountable for their mostly shoddy or unsubstantiatably and obvious manipulative analysis and recommendations. They have to know that the investors out here are watching them very closely. Most are over paid shills, or at best incompetent unaccomplised goons whos analysis is quite amatuerish compared to some of the work I have seen on SI. Don't get me wrong there are a few good ones out there but not many, most have a very unrealistic view and their interpretation of the facts often does not follow plain logic. And their universal arrogance could be laughable if it weren't for the fact that many have been led to the slaught by their ignorance and or malfeasencse. Robem, stealfromem, and co. also have another idiot, dan niles their semi condutor anal-yst. As dram prices were sliding almost 20% he came out and touted mu because dram was firming. In the following week dram slid another 6% and continues to deline. We all saw how mu blew earnings by .15 even after estimates were revised down .10 because of falling dram. I wonder how the suckers who listened to niles and bought in 50s feel now, I wonder if he gives a rats ass. At the conference call niles congratulated mu for their qtr., what a dork. These people do need to be held accountable. If they were maybe they would do a better more honest job. Sorry for running on. My question to you is where did you get the report and the e-mail address? I think this type of info should be posted on all analyst so anyone one on si or elsewhere can contact them and ask them the hard questions that need to be asked. They do like to hide in their ivory towers. Is there any publication that follows these analysts and their performance? If there is not there should be it would be a great way to rate their credibilty and ultimately it would serve as a means for their handlers to determine if they should remain in their positions. Good trading. RR

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next