Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (295686)	7/19/2006 12:13:07 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) of 1572122

But if the hydrocarbon source is carbon neutral... That's completely irrelevant. .. or at least almost completley. As long as we rely on fossil carbon sources, the best those things can do is slow the rate of accumulation We could burn less fossil fuel. The point is we have to burn less hydrocarbons regardless of the source. If we burn less fossil fuel it will produce less CO2 than if we burn keep burning "carbon neutral" fuels at the same rate as today. Carbon neutral may be a useful step while shutting down the fossil fuel sources, but it doesn't really help the underlying problem if carbon is just recycled faster back into the air.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next