SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (9663)7/19/2006 2:03:36 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (2) of 37568
 
And had Syria and the others not attacked Israel they would not have occupied those territories. I believe Israel offered to return them, and has returned some, on the signing of a permanent peace. That offer was refused as far as I know. Surely a country that beat back an invader has the right to determine what conditions must be fulfilled in order for it's attackers to regain their lost territory. Since the UN can offer no protection to Israel from invasion, why should Israel pay any attention to a toothless tiger. The UN is a dismal failure as far as a peace keeping organization and should be either closed or rebuilt from the ground up. One only has to read of the UN peacekeepers in Africa to know that the UN exists mostly as a place where crooks can gather graft from the various foreign aid projects it almost makes work.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News