| |
Joe E.,
>> Re your post with this P. S.:
"An addition to the second post: I believe that commercial internet web sites fall in the catagory of media, another words, they are sources of public information, whose content it is not possible to refute by the members of the general public, in an equaly powerfull manner, instantly or at any other later time. This is one of the reasons I support Pluvia's lawsuit against Westergaard, in Pluvia v. Westergaard."
First they come for Westergaard (who you disagree with), then for me (who you don't know) then finally you. See you in the soup kitchen! <<
You are right, I have no idea who you are, or why "they came for you," but when it comes to Pluvia v. Westergaard, you are either ignorant of the facts, or are intentionaly twisting them.
Pluvia "came for" Westergaard after Westergaard put a bounty on Pluvia's head. Want details? I'll give you details! Here is the link to the Pluvia v. Westergaard thread. Please do not read just the parts that suit you:
exchange2000.com
Now. Can you fill us in on why "they came for you?"
Bounced Czech
(Did the soup kitchen thing while paying my dues to my new home, in the USAF. Don't plan on doing it ever again, certainly not with you, wherever you're going, or already are.) |
|
