Well, your suggestions are kind of medieval but they are an improvement over what Israel is doing now. For added effect and entertainment value, maybe George Bush and Condi Rice could show up for the execution broadcast and drink the blood of the victims, just to show them that the US are not wimps. Maybe put a head on a stake or something. Graphic violence against militants at least beats killing innocent people from the security of a missile launcher, tank or bomber, as if it were some sort of video game.
As I have said before, and you have ignored, that is what the terrorists do to people they kidnap. If they don't get what they want, they cut their victims heads off on television. Why is it medieval for Israel to do it, but fine for Terrorists? You have all kinds of ways to gloss over what Hezbollah does, but continue to oppose any violence from Israel? Why is it okay for Hezbollah to be "killing innocent people from the security of a missile launcher," because you feel their missiles are not as effective, but wrong for the Israelis. Yes Israel has taken steps to protect it's citizens, why didn't Hezbollah provide bomb shelters for civilians when they wanted to start a war. Why do you feel it is all right to rain missiles down on Jews, but worthy of condemnation when it is Arabs. You have yet to say that Hezbollah is wrong, and that they should not have started this war. |
