SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Century Mining Corporation

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: John McCarthy7/23/2006 7:43:39 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 545
 
A comment -

just my dumb ass 2 cents .....

There seems to me a false sense of urgency.

Not sure why there should be.

Whats happened so far?

(a) We failed to meet production levels.

(b) Because we missed budgeted production levels
our OPTIONED GOLD (the $550 oz stuff) was a higher
% of the oz's we sold - and therefore - the revenues
we received - than would have been had we meet budgeted
production targets. This resulted in LOWER revenues
than were expected.

In cost accounting parlance:

Our Revenue Mix sucked .....

(c) Additionally, (a) and (b) brought about (1) a
higher Cost of Goods sold and (2) we took a hit
on the difference between our Optioned gold and
actual market price .... as an expense hit on
our P&L

thats what has happened ....

Going forward to 3rd quarter ....

(1) the trucks are late ..... and no one can define
how late ..... but they are VERY LATE.

(2) I don't know mining or whats involved but I have
concluded that 3rd quarter production cannot make
up for the YTD shortfall in production.

Said another way - if the new trucks are involved
in hauling out (is it called tailings?) of the last
year and a half - well - then they aren't involved
in bring ore to the mill ...... and hence 3rd quarter
production will suffer - against - trying to
make up the YTD shortfall in production - as well as -
bringing down Cost of Goods Sold to whatever the
YTD originally projected target level was.

So I am thinking for now that 3rd quarter production
is going to be a BUST - in terms of - bring YTD
ACTUAL back to YTD BUDGET.

Additionally, if **all** these trucks do is move tailings
because there is so much of it - then perhaps
we miss our QUARTERLY production target too. I just
don't know.

(3) While (2) is going on we are ALSO gonna spend millions
in that line item in our Profit and Loss Statement called EXPLORATION EXPENSE. We will do this because we
HAVE TO.

Its gotta be several millions for both the
3rd and 4th quarter.

These exploration costs will KILL OFF us reporting
significant profitablility for the 3rd quarter.

Now think about 3rd quarter reporting.

We and (potential investors) won't see these numbers
until LATE NOVEMBER.

I assume our 3rd Quarter P&L is gonna be a bust:

(a) YTD ACTUAL PRODUCTION not equal to
YTD BUDGETED PRODUCTION

(b) Low earnings after taxes (EAT) because of ongoing
EXPLORATION costs.

(c) Incremental costs of the new trucks.

(d) Whatever unexpected pops up.

If I am right - the stock price should go in the SHITTER
around that time.

Going forward to the 4th quarter ....

There are two big variables:

(a) The weather - does it slow down production.
(b) The then current price of market gold.

And ....
thats it ..... all prior negatives are behind us.

(a) the trucks are on board ....

(b) by the time they report 4th quarter we should
have a complient document for the oz at SJ.

(c) we will KNOW whether L is a working mine or not

(d) we will have some sense of production at SJ.

(e) with the exception of the weather - we should
make our budgeted production number - at least -
on a quarterly basis (although the mix from S and L and
P) might be different than expected

(f) we should realize actual market prices for the
gold we produce versus this $550 stuff.

Going forward to the 1st quarter 2007 ....

This is the sweet spot:

We find out how much gold GC has.

We hopefully and easily acheive our budgeted production
levels.

We should know all this by May-2007.

regards,
John McCarthy
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext