SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Century Mining Corporation

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HotnSpicy who wrote (171)7/27/2006 7:46:03 AM
From: John McCarthy  Read Replies (2) of 545
 
HS

Thanks for your post.

I was under the assumption(s) that:

(a) San Juan would take alot of holes.
(b) GC (can't spell it) would take alot of holes.

I got these assumptions from no one but myself based
on my limited knowledge of the mining industry.

If I read you right:

(a) We don't or probably don't need alot of holes at
San Juan in order to acheive the 43-101 compliant
document.

(b) GC is too hard to call - right now.

(c) And (to me) the big news is we may have already
in our posession (or close to it) documents [43-101]
for Santa Clarita and Erika.

I maybe reading the tea leaves wrong but item (c) is
big news to me - in that - it would let us plan now
to either (a) go it alone on these two properties or
(b) JV-up with one of the 3 firms who Peggy stated had
called CMM when CMM originally purchased.

Haven't looked, but I would hope that SH would talk
up item (c) as sort of a heads up to potential investors.

Also - I assume - these documents would be avail. on
SEDAR (?) at some point in the future for folks to review.

thanks again for your post,

regards,
John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext