SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : FREE AMERICA
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: faqsnlojiks who wrote (9755)7/27/2006 10:47:40 AM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) of 14758
 
I don't see that changing the facts is getting you anywhere.
You have lowered the amount of risk in your scenario by adding in condoms, but sex these days implies risk- greater or lesser. Period. For any certainty, you would want tests and you would remain monogamous. But it is still a risk that YOU decide to take.

In everything we do, we attempt to minimize our risks. Still, there are always some. We assume those risks regardless based on our needs or desires-- flying, driving a car, walking by a parachute landing site.

E;s point is that we should not have to have these risks imposed on us. In the smoking in restuarants case, we disagree on the control. But that is a different argument.
In fact, I have completely forgotten why we are having sex with people in bars or elsewhere. What was the point again?
:)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News