SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (24454)7/27/2006 12:24:09 PM
From: CrazyPete  Read Replies (1) of 78752
 
GE is a conglomerate. Their manufacturing side and their capital business operate as more or less independent entities. How is GE "taking advantage of their capital business to the detriment of shareholders", if this business is profitable and contributes substantially to their bottom line?!? This is just so wrong headed, it is hard for me to make any sense out of it at all.

None of the interest expense remains in the GE system, you boob. If that were the case, it would not be an expense.

Ok, imagine the following scenario. I own two businesses:

CP Industrial has revenue of $10 and expenses of $9, no debt, giving me $1 in profit.

CP Financial has revenue of $4 and interest expense of $3 on debt of $60, giving me $1 in profit.

I made $2. I have a lot of debt and 25% of my expenses are interest -- gosh, I would have made $5 if it wasn't for that debt! But double gosh, if it weren't for that debt, then CP Financial has no business and I make only $1!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext