SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation
DJT 13.09-1.8%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: T L Comiskey7/27/2006 5:31:47 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 360941
 
AssClown...........

Patrick Michaels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Patrick J. Michaels (born c. 1942?) is a professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, and the state climatologist for Virginia.
His professional specialty was the influence of climate on agriculture. He is noted for his views as an opponent of global warming theory and frequently writes and speaks for popular audiences on the topic of climate change. He is a fellow of the Cato Institute and edits the World Climate Report, published by the Western Fuels Association through WFA's Greening Earth Society. He has received substantial financial support from the energy industry. His work has been published in Climate Research, Climatic Change and Geophysical Research Letters.

Michaels is one of a group of global warming skeptics and continues to dispute some aspects of global warming, including evidence of rising global temperatures. He has been accused of accepting $100,000 from energy industry interests to support his efforts to discredit the science of global warming. Recent statements suggest, however, that he is accepting the conclusion of the IPCC that there is a human influence on the climate, though he continues to maintain that current and future warming will occur at the low end of the range IPCC assessments:

scientists know quite precisely how much the planet will warm in the foreseeable future, a modest three-quarters of a degree (C) [in 50 years]
All this has to do with basic physics, which isn't real hard to understand. It has been known since 1872 that as we emit more and more carbon dioxide into our atmosphere, each increment results in less and less warming. In other words, the first changes produce the most warming, and subsequent ones produce a bit less, and so on. But we also assume carbon dioxide continues to go into the atmosphere at an ever-increasing rate. In other words, the increase from year-to-year isn't constant, but itself is increasing. The effect of increasing the rate of carbon dioxide emissions, coupled with the fact that more and more carbon dioxide produces less and less warming compels our climate projections for the future warming to be pretty much a straight line. Translation: Once human beings start to warm the climate, they do so at a constant rate. [1]
This "linear" view is not accepted by most climate scientists, nor is it supported by either modeling data or observation. Michaels is also known for his reliance on satellite temperature measurements that seemed to contradict other evidence of global warming. Recent corrections to those measurements now show global warming at rates almost identical to that seen in other measurements.

Contents [hide]
1 Attempted betting on global warming
2 CFCs and ozone
3 Intermountain Rural Electric Association Controversy
4 External links


[edit]
Attempted betting on global warming
Like global warming skeptics Richard Lindzen and William M. Gray, Michael's World Climate Report offered in late 1998 "to wager that the 10-year period beginning in January 1998 and extending through December 2007 will show a statistically significant downward trend in the monthly satellite record of global temperatures."[2] Climatologist James Annan,[3] who has offered multiple bets that global temperatures will increase,[4] learned of the offer in 2005 and contacted the Report to arrange a bet.[5] An editor from World Climate Report responded, reneging on the original bet offer and declining to make a new bet starting from the present.

[edit]
CFCs and ozone
Michaels has also engaged in controversy regarding the impact of CFCs on the ozone layer. In particular, he has criticised predictions of thinning of the ozone layer over the Arctic, first made in 1992 [6]. However, significant depletion of Arctic ozone has been observed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext