>>Honey wrote: Are you saying that Brinker's integrity, honesty and truthfulness in the past, present and future simply don't matter?
>QueenOfMultipleIDs wrote: Not at all. Integrity, honesty and truthfulness are always important, a commendable but not always attained goal, for anyone. I'm saying that Brinker's integrity, honesty and truthfulness in the past, present and future are not as questionable IMO as several of the professional critics on this site."
Well, you are correct. Today you showed your honesty is zero.
I see, by clicking on your name, that you were banished for multiple accounts, a TOS violation. You told us in the past you lived on a big farm and your job is to run the farm. Today a link was sent to me by email where you said something VERY different about an email exchange with SI managers. You said:
Then there was another person in the business here in another department that had an account on another computer, so I suspected that was the hangup and wrote again with the explanation. He considered that "unlikely", he said. So now both accounts are terminated.
Someone asked you on the forum where you wrote that note why you call the rooms of your farmhouse "departments?"
As someone once said "Games up!"
Now, what all who lurk here should ask themselves, why have dija and mathjunkie played along with this clear fraud who's only goal on the message boards has been for years to lie about Brinker's critics on both a personal and professional level? |
