Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (174867)	7/28/2006 12:38:05 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 793851

Michael Young makes sense. Nasrallah has launched a war without a by-your-leave to the other 2/3 of Lebanon. If you do that, you had better win, and win fast, which is why Nasrallah needs a quick cease-fire that would leave him armed and in a position to claim victory. Condi Rice seems to be quite cleverly denying him that cease-fire, by arranging a consensus around the idea that going back to the status quo ante is not acceptable. If it's not acceptable, then it becomes a question of who disarms Hizbullah, Israeli forces or NATO forces? Not surprisingly, NATO would rather the Israelis do it. So this puts off demands for the immediate cease-fire. I must say I'm surprised. Once the shooting does stop, Nasrallah is going to face the wrath of the rest of Lebanon.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next