Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pigstuff who wrote (22651)	7/28/2006 3:33:20 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) of 42834

First of all, can you please explain what your post has to do with the topic of this thread? "The mystery Mr Junkie is twofold. If they are here, where are the 20 or 30 recs per message? (or at least the usual 10-14). Are 'they' here, and they just choose not to give recs?" As you admit, 20 or 30 recs was unusual. So was 10 to 14, in my recollecton. Typical was in the three to five range. Whatever the number was, how do you know that everyone who read the Yahoo UTEK board has established an account at SI?. And what's your point anyway? I've never disputed that there were multiple recs on Yahoo, and I've never disputed that there were people posting under multiple screen names on Yahoo. "The 2nd part is that NOW you admit/suggest that people at Utek were using up to 5 names?" I never said otherwise. If you would try to read what I actually write, it would really help move the conversation along. "Surprise-surprise! I thought there were 20 or 30 drive-by people. Which is it? Which spinning top will you decide to settle on?" I don't know how many people lurked there without posting, and I don't think you do either. I do know that it requires multiple accounts to give multiple recs, unless it's the guy who posted as "phoneyrec_counter." He's the only guy who claimed to know how to give unlimited numbers of recs (and he never agreed with Queen, that I ever saw, in case you're wondering). messages.finance.yahoo.com "p.s. There is no need to keep your eyes open anymore. The blatantly obvious has taken it's expected course. I'm so disappointed that you could not see it. So much for fair and objective." If I don't accept "it's obvious" claims from Stockalot, what makes you think I'm going to accept them from you? You still haven't said what your point is in this discussion.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next