>>First of all, can you please explain what your post has to do with the topic of this thread?
Well now, Mr Math Junkie, I would like to thank you for your question. You should be much more careful about throwing rocks from a glass house! You make it much too simple to show your duplicity, displaced self-rightousness, and closed mind thinking.
My post was a reply to your #22648 which had nothing to do with this thread, as is the case for #22644-22650, and numerous other posts by you. Do you want me to point all of them out?
What did the 17 paragraphs in post #22663 have to do with Bob Brinker? That note does not trouble you, even though the last line in it parrots the exact same question? "And a final question: how does any of your inaccurate and defamatory post have anything to do with Brinker or his strategies?"
>>f you would try to read what I actually write, it would really help move the conversation along.
I think it would be more beneficial for YOU to reread what you are writing.
>>You still haven't said what your point is in this discussion.
The same as yours, Math Junkie, the same as yours!
>>I sure hope SI Admin is not buying your unsubstantiated accusations against another poster, who oh-by-the-way you just happen to disagree with, without independent verification.
There you go again! Making unfounded accusations while in the same breath asking for proof in the previous note about proof! (on 2 separate forums, no less)
Do you have any proof or substantiations? So far, you are the only one that has publically admitted the desire to complain to management.
Duplicitous and double standards for sure. |
