SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Picks of the quarter
ATHR 5.530-6.7%3:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: snookcity who wrote (1099)7/28/2006 6:22:12 PM
From: Sr K  Read Replies (1) of 20435
 
ETFs also have different tax consequences than stocks.

But they are funds. It's the 3rd word in the name.

They have a layer of fees including in some cases royalty or license fees.

Most people know that statistically, the broad indices have outperformed actively managed funds over a long-enough period.

Taken to the extreme, a "player" in the contest could choose two broad-based ETF's and no one here is going to take the time to compare the holdings for overlap. If someone won with SPY and QQQQ, what's the point? What about a sector ETF and then having a component also in the portfolio so the holding of that stock is really over 50%?

Choosing an ETF, except as a money-market substitute until you really choose is admitting that one can't beat the averages, on average.

This is a game, a contest to see who can beat the averages or other players, over time or just once.

I still think ETFs should not be considered an equity. And the rules #4 and #5 for "equities" referred to diversification within the portfolio not for one choice that is a portfolio.

How often they trade doesn't matter. We do not allow midday transactions.

IMO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext