SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: stockalot7/28/2006 10:21:45 PM
  Read Replies (2) of 42834
 
Math on another site you hammered me claiming you never took exception to my take that Queen was also posting as "Butter" here. I am curious as to why you did that posting to Queen on that other site and not here, because it is obviously untrue. You seemed to try to hide the facts. Indeed there and here you proffered the idea that I had no clue and there was no connection. Well Queen ADMITTED the CONNECTION TO Butter at Yahoo and admitted that indeed those aliases bit the dust for multialias posting on this site. sHE claimed own a farm and unbenknownst to her someone in an office complex in another "department" of this farm began posting as "butter" here at the same time she began posting under a bunch of queens. That pretty much buries your claim that she had no relationship to Butter.

From: stockalot 7/26/2006 6:00:22 PM
2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 22701

Amazing that Queen and Butter think exactly alike, post nearly identical thoughts, have the same affinity for protecting Brinker from those not enamored with him or his hubris, and arrived within 24 hrs of one another. Tis a miracle.

Now my point is why do these people spend years stalking and hammering those who simply enjoy discussing the public figure, Brinker who has a two bit radio show and makes claims of being the worlds best marketimer? They seldom have anything truly relevant to the Brinker discussion but want to disrupt and badger those with opinions of Brinker that vary from theirs. They can certainly offer opposing opinions but sticking to the topic of Brinker and not getting off topic and making personal attacks against non public figures like they do on every other site they have used should be a minimum expectation of posting here.

I believe the topic on this thread is Bob Brinker. I think that if you don't have anything to say about the guy in your post pro or con, then it is off topic and in violation of the terms of use.

I would guess why many are angry and complaining about off topics in an effort to make Brinker look better is the recent flap over Brinker's claims on his performance.

On Yahoo tonight I see you naively pretend that you were talking only about the "butter"that used to shill for Brinker on that site. You have insinuated that Dave arbitrarily kicked off Queen's alias and it had nothing to do with Butter or any alias other than "Queen". Yet Queen admits that indeed sHE was linked to "Butter" and wants desperately to shut you up because the more you vouch for her credibility and she has to explain how this "Butter" from her ISP starting at the same time on SI is an employee in a "different department" of her farm is logical hurts the Brinker shill cause. She asked you to please stop talking about it--cause it doesn't make sense to ANYBODY with common sense.



Indeed you knew I wasn't talking about the "butter" on Yahoo now didn't you Math?

"To: stockalot who wrote (22580) 7/27/2006 5:33:59 AM
From: Math Junkie Respond to of 22701

"I believe the topic on this thread is Bob Brinker."

You should try to remember that the next time you are considering posting your speculations about how many accounts other posters have.

If you have actual evidence that someone is posting under more than one screen name here, as opposed to speculation based on the fact that certain people agree with each other, then you should click on the "Report TOU Violation" link at the bottom of your screen and give your evidence to Dave. I believe he takes that kind of thing very seriously, but I think he is going to want something a little more solid than people thinking alike."

Queen admits that I was correct and if you choose to believe there is a farm out there with departments and two employees joined SI within hours of one another to hammer Brinker's critics and tout the guy, then go for it.

I think SI did a great service for those who are truly looking for information on Bob Brinker (I thought you were in that camp) and information on marketiming in general. If the discussion can be about Brinker without mulitalias posters hammering the critics, but have only a single ID for such a person to counter with logic the controversy about Bob Brinker everyone is served.

I've always much more enjoyed those who can argue Brinker's side under one alias without pretending to be a "bunch o people" At SI it appears that is much more likely to happen, apparently to your chagrin.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News