Bob Rules seems to be in quite a snit at Yahoo and I haven't been posting there at all tonight. I guess you and that screen name are "close" huh? :)
Well ok, you say you never posted as peanut_butter here on SI? . Please don't try to clutter up the issue with more butters, we are only talking about the screen name that was banished at the same time your last queen name was banished here.
Your names peanut_butter and queen90700 or whatever the numbers came here within a day of one another.
On all the history of this site, no one had used the acronym AAR. yet in a few days YOU used the AAR under both the Queen and the peanut butter screen names in just that short period of time the names were here sounding exactly the same before being BANISHED together. What a coincidence huh? And the Isps were coming from "different departments" in the same "business" the alibi to SI claimed. He didn't seem to buy that as well he should not. I'm guessing Dave saw the AAR as well.
Just type AAR in the search and you will see that you under these two aliases were the only person to use AAR until tonight on these threads.
Here was "peanut_butter"
To: Kirk who wrote (22567) 7/26/2006 1:36:14 PM
From: peanut_butter 4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 22758
kirk said "May I suggest you not use HTML unil [sic] you learn how to use the preview? I can't tell where your quotes end and your comments begin.
Yes, I don't know why it didn't work. I did use preview and I did go back and check twice with editing. I had it right. Maybe it just doesn't work with my operating system.
AAR, I notice in all of that long self-promotion message, you didn't address my main point at all, which was that *I* wasn't the one "making trouble" as you charged.
Nothing to say about that?
Why am I not surprised? "
Now here you are in the Queen name that was banished along with Butter typing the only other use of AAR in the history of SI, till tonight.
To: fahrenheit451 who wrote (22413) 7/23/2006 12:15:46 PM
From: queen90700 5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 22760
Wow, fahrenheit, I don't think we've been introduced, but I'm surprised to see you taking gratuitous swipes at queen, when we haven't even spoken before. Or have we? I think I read that you apparently adopted and imped someone else's discarded ID, an ID strongly identified with someone here who used the ID before. This sort of apparently deliberate attempt at deceit makes me suspect ye olde Yahoo Imp. AAR, hello again.
"Fahrenheit" wrote: "Now I suspect the queen will say that this is hearsay and I can't prove that is what Brinker's website said last Sunday. Well sorry but there is an archive and here is that statement on the web page last year."
I'm not sure why I'm in there at all since I have said NOTHING about the Hulbert-Marketimer dispute, (except to say that it remains to be seen) since I have seen neither of them. To comment on them would be speculation on my part and there's enough of that here already, in fact it is voluminous. If I had to speculate, I'd say it's a tempest in a teapot which is the usual m.o. of those who live to bash and jump like vultures on carrion on any possible misstatement that they can shred to pieces. Perhaps a distraction from the "Third" place ranking, which is excellent in my book.
I WILL say that the nit-picky semantic holocaust regarding the way Brinker worded anything is old, old, old but at least the nitpickers have manufactured something new to scream "LIE!" about. Seems to keep them entertained. I don't know what Brinker said or didn't say, but I know you can always trust the Bashers to make a "lie" out of something that could have been worded better. It seems to be what they live for."
Now are you sitting down Queen? In the many many many thousands of posts on Yahoo, look who has EVERY use of AAR--Queen and another alias you used to say the exact same stuff, barbobbot.
betasearch.messages.yahoo.com
Topics and Messages containing "AAR"
Sorted by: Date | Top Results Author Date
1. Re: Link to Old Format
...its got something to do with operating system or something, I dont know. AAR , Ive been through this with yahoo before and its why people end up going to...
Business & Finance > Investments > Sectors > Technology > Semiconductors > Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (UTEK) queenofquibble 16-Jul-06 12:58 am
2. Re: Suggestion For This Forum
... they? If so, I havent seen it. But I havent studied it much yet. AAR , I think it would be better to sort and resort our messages...
Business & Finance > Investments > Sectors > Technology > Semiconductors > Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (UTEK) queenofquibble 15-Jul-06 04:08 pm
3. Re: sorry della
sorry della, I dont think you asked that question of me, did you? AAR , I dont know anything about a two-story outhouse of which you post so I cant answer that...
Business & Finance > Investments > Sectors > Technology > Semiconductors > Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (UTEK) barbobbot 11-May-06 04:34 pm
4. Re: Update
... so many times) or are you a new \"imp\" just to confuse us? :-)AAR , you have a rather \"offbeat\" sense of humor. Stay safe down there.
Business & Finance > Investments > Sectors > Technology > Semiconductors > Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (UTEK) queenofquibble 23-Sep-05 10:45 pm
How do you explain peanut_butter getting banished the same day you were for multialias posting? You claimed this happened because some one just happened to have a Silicon Investor membership in "another department" of your business but said Dave didn't buy that. ....as nobody would.
Now are we to believe that in the history of the tens and tens of thousands of posts on SI and Yahoo, that you and peanut_butter shilling for Brinker are the only two that ever use the acronymn AAR and were only here for a few days and used it under both names?
What are the odds? Maybe getting stuck by lightening and living on 10 consecutive days? Maybe about as likely as Brinker including the QQQ disaster honestly in his performance figures? Maybe about as likely as you not fibbing after getting caught red handed and encourgaging your friends to lend support and raising ned like you were being picked on by SI over on Yahoo. |
