kirk said -two people in the same "small farm office"
BTW, I don't believe I said the offices were small or large, so you are assuming things not said also.
-independently deciding to join an obscure forum to talk about stocks related to Silicon chips
But I thought they came to talk about Brinker, since THIS particular forum was supposed to talk about Bob Brinker, not silicon chips. The timing is not so odd when you consider the circumstances...the extreme unpopularity of Yahoo's message board changes, and the suggestions that came forward on that board about SI at the same time as a consequence of that change. Several different people came here at about that same time.
-then making their first posts within hours of each other
which proves WHAT?
on a message board for a radio entertainer who has "jumped the shark"
which means WHAT?
-rather than the hundreds of other forums here dedicatd to silicon investing...
See above. Not so odd under the circumstances.
But if we can call you Mrs Bob Brinker Jr.,...
Well, you can if you want to but I'd have to tell you you're about as far from accurate as you can be on that one, each time you do.
...then your story is entirely credible...
Yes, thank you, it is indeed. I don't know what we would do without you.
... since husbands and wives usually share ISPs and IP addresses but don't always share computers. Many even have their own rooms to post from.
PRECISELY, KIRK! Thank you for confirming that simple fact! Without confirming or denying how the other person is related, which of course is no one's business, I thank you for confirming that this is not such an inconceivable arrangement!
But I wonder, if YOU can understand this simple arrangement without semantically shredding it and picking it to pieces, I wonder why it's so difficult for others?
Do you think it could have something to do with their Brinker "agenda"?
|
