SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Math Junkie who wrote (22833)7/31/2006 6:28:15 PM
From: stockalot  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
Math why don't you give it up? This story "evolves" to hide the guilt. You are now becoming the enabler for this flight of fancy. She was CAUGHT, period end of sentence. But since you want to belabor the point. Here is what she said on Yahoo right after being banished.

"Hmmmm. I posted two or three times today at SI. All of a sudden tonight, I'm banished. I have no idea why. I guess somebody with some pull doesn't like me. LOL. So long for now. Good luck dija, math and shres. "

Now she didn't say goodbye "peanut_butter" did she? Why not? Indeed she did not admit that peanut better had been hit in the bottom with the swinging door until after you posted the obvious on Yahoo. Then she had this stilted alibi to the SI administration.

"Then there was another person in the business here in another department that had an account on another computer, so I suspected that was the hangup and wrote again with the explanation."

Then when this sounds very strange for a farming situation, we evolve into a family situation. Had that been the truth, it would have been much more believable for Queen to have simply explained it honestly to the administration. I know this person from Yahoo. She had enough aliases of both genders to carry on a conversation with herself over there for a day and nobody would have known everybody else was gone. You could not take her/his word for anything any further than you could throw a clydesdale. Her story "evolves" to match what is expedient. When caught the story and the nose grows longer. Obviously that is going on now. I don' t know why you want to beat this dead horse. She was caught--period.


She can take it up with SI and explain that she was not using these two aliases that arrived at the same time, posted the same stuff and used a rare acronym. I don't buy it. So whining to me to change my mind when she was caught doing the same thing she majored in at Yahoo, doesn't help either of us. All I want is for this forum to remain as it should be; one person, one screen name and none of her over the top multi alias activity as at Yahoo. Then it can focus on Brinker pro or con with a degree of fairness and likely more civility since she can't just change screen names and hammer those with opposing views pretending to be a hoard of Brinker believers.

I could care less about her, but as long as you want to argue that SI was wrong, and the multialias pro Brinker poster is innocent and being picked on, I will be happy to set the record straight.
These links say it all. Simply a matter of Queen wanting "more" screen names Case closed.

Member 9114270

Member 9114296
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext