SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (12014)7/31/2006 6:38:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) of 22250
 
I don't exactly hold the UN in high regard. Some of the observers have helped Hezbollah attack Israel in the past. The UN as a whole is very anti-Israel. That doesn't mean that one can assume that what it says is wrong and I make no such assumption. However I find any argument from authority with a UN report (or in this case a claim about a UN report not the report itself) as the authority, to be a very weak argument.

Even if I was willing to accept an argument from authority based on a UN report, you do not link to any official UN report, you link to an article where a person claims to have seen such reports. So if I assume he is accurately relating the information in those reports and I assume that the reports are both honest and not-mistaken, and contain all the relevant facts, than you might have something. But I don't consider those assumptions to be safe ones.

Or to reply again to "Your documentation is impressive. <g>"

Neither has provided anything that would reasonably be considered documentation supporting our viewpoint.

Edit - But once again whatever happened in the 80s in Lebanon, Hezbollah initiated the attacks this time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext